NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v R [2017] NSWCCA 175 Hearing dates: 19 July 2017 Decision date: 24 July 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Price J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for leave to appeal against sentence – offence of causing grievous bodily harm with intent – HELD – sentencing judge entitled to treat facts in expert reports with caution where no sworn evidence given by the applicant – discount allowed for a plea is a matter of discretion for sentencing judge – no error in discount of 15 per cent allowed by sentencing judge – none of grounds made out Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33, 35, 61 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 21A, 22, 32 Cases Cited: R v Qutami (2001) 127 A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rebecca Joy Smith (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (Self-represented) T Smith (Respondent)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/244791 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 10 June 2016 Before: Norrish DCJ File Number(s): 2014/244791
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate