NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dr Praneal Dutt Sharma v Dr Phillip Segal and Dr Greg Chen [Costs] [2017] NSWSC 973 Hearing dates: By written submission Decision date: 21 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Plaintiffs are to pay the costs of the proceedings of the first and third defendants. Catchwords: COSTS – where adjudication of a single issue ultimately determines the outcome of proceedings and cross-claims are not pressed – HELD – no reason to depart from the primary rule that costs follow the event. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bullock v London & General Omnibus Co [1907] 1 KB 264 Dr Praneal Dutt Sharma v Dr Phillip Segal and Dr Greg Chen [2017] NSWSC 887 Category: Costs Parties: Praneal Dutt Sharma - First Plaintiff Praneal Sharma & Associates Pty Ltd - Second Plaintiff Phillip Segal - First Defendant Greg Chen - Second Defendant Melita Segal - Third Defendant Yanyi Pty Limited - Fourth Defendant South West Radiology Pty Ltd - Fifth Defendant SWR Pty Ltd - Sixth Defendant Park Central Radiology Pty Ltd - Seventh Defendant Representation: Counsel: S.A. Lawrance with D.E. Birch - Plaintiffs M. Izzo - First and Third Defendants A. Hourigan - Second and Fourth Defendants
Solicitors: Carneys Lawyers - Plaintiffs Clayton Utz - First and Third Defendants Booth Boorman Kiely - Second and Fourth Defendants File Number(s): 2016/322612
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate