NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Robertson v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) & District Court NSW [2017] NSWCA 180 Hearing dates: 30 June 2017 Date of orders: 26 July 2017 Decision date: 26 July 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Meagher JA at [30]; Wilson J at [31] Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – generally – s 32 of Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 – whether applicant eligible under s 32 – whether failure to make finding as to jurisdiction – whether denial of procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 58, 61, 195 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) s 11 Liquor Act 2007 (NSW) s 77 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) ss 31, 32 Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW) s 4 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 69 Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions v Lopez-Aguilar [2013] NSWSC 1019 DPP v El Mawas [2006] NSWCA 154 Gommesen v The Queen (2012) 62 MVR 196; [2012] NSWCCA 226 Monte v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2015] NSWSC 318 Mulder v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2015] NSWCA 92; (2015) 250 A Crim R 154 Rajendran v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 113 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David John Robertson (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Applicant) A M Mitchelmore (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate