NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CC United Developments Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1389 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 July 2017 Date of orders: 21 July 2017 Decision date: 21 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – shop top housing - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CC United Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitor: Ms E Fleming, SWAAB Attorneys (Applicant) Ms J Corradini-Bird, Marsdens (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/360387 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the following amended material: Drawing No. Drawing Title Prepared by Date of Plan DA09 Rev O Demolition and early siteworks plan Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA10 Rev O Proposed lane right of way Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA11 Rev O Car park 02 Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA12 Rev O Car park 01 Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA13 Rev O Ground level Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA14 Rev O Level 01 Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA15 Rev O Level 02 Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA16 Rev O Level 03 Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA17 Rev O Level 04 Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA18 Rev O Roof Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA19 Rev O Street elevations Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA20 Rev O Side elevations Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA21 Rev O Long sections Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA22 Rev O Cross sections Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 DA25 Rev O Finishes Kennedy Associates Architects 13 June 2017 LA01 Rev B Level 1 Landscape Plan Taylor Brammer 3 July 2017 LA03 Rev C Level 4 Landscape Plan Taylor Brammer 3 July 2017 LA03 Rev B Landscape Details Taylor Brammer 15 May 2017 Updated Cl.4.6 written requested dated July 2017 BASIX Certificate No. 620407M_02
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate