NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Qin v He [2017] NSWSC 978 Hearing dates: 21 July 2017 Date of orders: 21 July 2017 Decision date: 21 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) The proceedings are dismissed pursuant to r 13.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
(2) The Plaintiff is to pay the costs of the First and Third Defendants. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary dismissal – whether statement of claim pleaded any cause of action – whether proceedings are frivolous and vexatious – plaintiff self-represented – whether pleaded claim was manifestly hopeless – loan agreement between plaintiff and another and one of three defendants – borrower is undischarged bankrupt – plaintiff and other lender obtained judgment against borrower on loan agreement in Local Court – claim by plaintiff for interest in two properties where loan monies were said to be expended – one property owned jointly by borrower and another defendant – one property owned by two defendants but not borrower – whether any basis for equitable tracing – other lender not a party to proceedings – claim manifestly hopeless – summary dismissal order made
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – second attempt at pleading - irrelevant material pleaded – pleading contained evidence – difficulty discerning cause of action – whether pleading embarrassing – whether further opportunity to plead should be given Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 McGuirk v The University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 Spencer v The Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 Waters v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] NSWSC 790 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Wei Wen Qin (Plaintiff) Kaijun He (First Defendant) Li Li (Second Defendant) View Land Properties Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiff) K Young (First & Third Defendants) No appearance (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate