NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smith v Jones (pseudonyms) [2017] NSWSC 980 Hearing dates: 16 June 2017 Decision date: 20 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Subpoena to Bravehearts Foundation set aside; plaintiff to pay Bravehearts Foundation's costs of the application. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoenas – application to have subpoena set aside – proceedings for defamation raising an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sexually assaulted his son – subpoena issued by the plaintiff to a welfare organisation that had studied the experience of victims of sexual assault with the Family Law system – plaintiff seeking to obtain documents relating to that organisation's consideration of the son's story – public interest in protecting confidential information in the case of organisations which rely upon confidentiality for their very existence Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 126B Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 33.4(1) Cases Cited: Crawford v Sisinis [2014] FamCA 912 Goldy v Goldy (No 2) [2011] FamCA 418 Patonga Beach Holdings Pty Limited v Lyons [2009] NSWSC 869 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: xx Representation: Counsel: C Dibb (plaintiff) S Chrysanthou (defendants) E Muston SC, J Granger (for Bravehearts Foundation - applicant)
Solicitors: Capital Lawyers (plaintiff) Kalantzis Lawyers (defendants) Clayton Utz (applicant) File Number(s): 2016/85803 Publication restriction: The parties are referred to by pseudonyms in this judgment. No non-publication order has been made in these proceedings. However, pseudonyms are necessary having regard to the prohibition contained in s 121(1) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate