NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Siwek v R [2017] NSWCCA 178 Hearing dates: 21 July 2017 Date of orders: 28 July 2017 Decision date: 28 July 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Adamson J at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Appeal – Sentence – Multiple counts of fraud committed by employee over a significant period of time – Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to apply a discount to reflect the fact that a portion of the monies had been repaid – Whether sentencing judge erred in failing to apply a discount to reflect the applicant's gambling addiction – Whether sentence was manifestly excessive – Where the sentencing judge had taken into account all relevant mitigating factors – Where asserted errors were not made out – Sentence not manifestly excessive – Leave to appeal granted – Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Assi v R [2006] NSWCCA 257 Flaherty v R; R v Flaherty (2016) 92 NSWLR 290; [2016] NSWCCA 188 Johnston v R [2017] NSWCCA 53 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Weismantel [2016] NSWCCA 204 R v Roth [2015] NSWDC, 18 December 2015 unreported RLS v R [2012] NSWCCA 236 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Siwek – Applicant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Applicant – In person N Adams - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate