NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Bouffler [2017] NSWCA 185 Hearing dates: 20 February 2017 Decision date: 27 July 2017 Before: Beazley ACJ; Ward JA; Gleeson JA Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal and cross-appeal;
(2) Appeal allowed;
(3) Set aside the orders of the trial judge;
(4) Order judgment for the State of New South Wales;
(5) Cross-appeal dismissed;
(6) The respondent to pay the costs of the State of New South Wales at first instance and 70 per cent of its costs on the appeal. Catchwords: TORTS – trespass to land – whether entry of police officers authorised by law – six police officers entered house occupied by the respondent without his consent – eight officers entered respondent's property without consent – officers relied on ss 9 and 10 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) – whether officers had requisite state of mind to satisfy ss 9 and 10 – whether officers must each individually have state of mind – whether officers can enter to assist other officers engaged in an arrest – circumstances in which state of mind can be inferred
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION – Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) – whether each officer must individually have state of mind required under ss 9, 10 and 99 – whether context and purpose indicates that meaning is to be given that is different from or qualifies plain meaning – meaning of "reasonable grounds"
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION – Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) – relationship between ss 10 and 99 – whether entry to a premises pursuant to LEPRA, s 10 requires a lawful arrest under s 99 – whether s 10 operates as a derivative of s 99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate