NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Quach v New South Wales Crown Solicitor [2017] NSWSC 991 Hearing dates: 25 July 2017 Date of orders: 26 July 2017 Decision date: 26 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: (1) The Summons filed by the plaintiff dated 12 July 2017 is dismissed.
(2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs associated with the Summons. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – prohibition order sought against Crown Solicitor appearing for the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission in the ACT Supreme Court – whether Crown Solicitor had standing to appear – order sought not granted – abuse of process where order sought is in effect the same as an order refused by this Court Legislation Cited: Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW) ss 99A, 100 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) s 44 Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 r 29.1 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596; [1990] HCA 57 Batistatos v Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256; [2006] HCA 27 Quach v New South Wales Crown Solicitor [2017] NSWSC 904 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dr Michael Van Thanh Quach (Plaintiff) New South Wales Crown Solicitor (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Thomson (Defendant)
Solicitors: Dr Quach, self-represented (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor's Office (Defendant) File Number(s): 2017/211987 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate