NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: PNC Lifestyle Investments Pty Ltd v REW08 Projects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 993 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 26 July 2017 Decision date: 26 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Damages awarded for increased building costs sustained by plaintiff due to defendant's delay in completion of the contract. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – damages for breach of contract – separate determination of damages following decree of specific performance of contract for sale of land – delay in completion of contract – claim for damages for increased building costs and lost rental income – date for assessment – whether causation of loss established
EQUITY – equitable remedies – equitable damages pursuant to Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 68 – claim for damages in addition to decree of specific performance – delay in completion of contract – claim for damages for increased building costs and lost rental income – date for assessment – whether causation of loss established Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 68 Cases Cited: Clark v Macourt (2013) 253 CLR 1; [2013] HCA 56 European Bank Ltd v Evans (2010) 240 CLR; [2010] HCA 6 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 156 ER 145 Lahoud v Lahoud (2009) NSW ConvR 56-245; [2009] NSWSC 623 Madden v Kevereski [1983] 1 NSWLR 305 NG v Filmlock Pty Ltd (2014) 88 NSWLR 146; [2014] NSWCA 389 Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd v Lesvos Pty Ltd (2007) 13 BPR 24,799; [2007] NSWCA 176 PNC Lifestyle Investments Pty Ltd v REW08 Projects Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 27 State of New South Wales v Burton [2008] NSWCA 319 The Mediana [1900] AC 113 Wenham v Ella (1972) 127 CLR 454 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672 Wroth v Tyler [1974] Ch 30 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, M J Leeming and P G Turner, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (LexisNexis Butterworths, 5th ed, 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: PNC Lifestyle Investments Pty Limited (Plaintiff) REW08 Projects Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Doyle (Plaintiff) Mr P Folino-Gallo (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate