NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McGrath v Mestousis [2017] NSWSC 995 Hearing dates: 19 – 20 June 2017 Date of orders: 27 July 2017 Decision date: 27 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Easement imposed pursuant to s 88K of the Conveyancing Act for drainage of water. Catchwords: LAND LAW – easements – imposition of easements by Court – stormwater drainage easement associated with development of residential land – whether easement reasonably necessary for effective use or development of the land – effect of easement upon servient tenement – risk of damage caused by easement works – difficulty in carrying out easement works in compliance with conditions of consent – easement imposed Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 88K Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 80(3), 95(6) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.14, 31.46 Cases Cited: Govindan-Lee v Sawkins (2016) 18 BPR 35,883; [2016] NSWSC 328 Khattar v Wiese (2005) 12 BPR 23,235; [2005] NSWSC 1014 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd (2012) 16 BPR 31,257; [2012] NSWCA 445 Shi v ABI-K Pty Ltd (2014) 87 NSWLR 568; [2014] NSWCA 293 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patrick Raymond McGrath (First Plaintiff) Sally Jane McGrath (Second Plaintiff) Kristo Mestousis (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P G Bolster (Plaintiffs) Mr A M Gruzman (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate