NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ZEO v ZEP [2017] NSWCATAP 166 Hearing dates: 19 July 2017 Date of orders: 03 August 2017 Decision date: 03 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Schyvens, Deputy President M Harrowell, Principal Member L Porter, General Member Decision: 1 Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is dismissed. 2. Order 3 made 10 April 2017 in application 2017/1779 is varied to read as follows: This order be reviewed by the Tribunal within four months. Catchwords: Guardianship Act – Financial management order, appeal, exercise of discretion, leave to appeal on question of fact, absence of evidence from original hearing. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Holt v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 John Prendergast & Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 M v M [2013] NSWSC 1495 Re R [2000] NSWSC 886 Re TLH, a protected person [2017] NSWSC 737 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ZEO (Appellant)
ZEP (protected person) (First respondent) NSW Trustee and Guardian (Second respondent) ZES (Third respondent) ZEU (Fourth respondent) ZET (Fifth respondent) Representation: ZEO (Appellant in person )
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate