NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Popovic; R v Koloamatangi (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1022 Hearing dates: 1,2 August 2017 Decision date: 04 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: See paragraph [90] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder trial – application to exclude evidence on the basis of relevance and on basis that probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice
CRIMINAL LAW – application to exclude evidence of representations made by the deceased – hearsay rule Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 55, 59, 65, 67, 135, 137 Cases Cited: Colby v The Queen [1999] NSWCCA 261 IMM v The Queen (2016) 330 ALR 382; [2016] HCA 14 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Popovic v R; Hristovski v R; Bubanja v R; and Koloamatangi v R [2016] NSWCCA 202 R v Shamouil (2006) 6 NSWLR 228; [2006] NSWCCA 112 R v XY (2013) 84 NSWLR 363; [2013] NSWCCA 121 Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650; [2001] HCA 50 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Zlatan Popovic (Accused) Tevi Koloamatangi (Accused) Representation: Counsel:
Mr P Barrett (Crown) Mr L Brasch (Accused Popovic) Ms C Davenport SC (Accused Koloamatangi)
Solicitor:
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Toomey Lawyers (Accused Popovic) Katsoolis & Co (Accused Koloamatangi) File Number(s): 2012/00232565; 2012/00370471
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate