NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Algie v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 243 Hearing dates: 21 and 22 June 2017 Date of orders: 09 August 2017 Decision date: 09 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: NS Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision to refuse to grant Ms Algie's application for an operator licence under the Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 is affirmed. Catchwords: MERITS REVIEW – tattoo parlour – operator licence – fit and proper person – public interest - adverse security determination - confidential information - Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Tattoo Parlours Regulation 2013 Cases Cited: Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading + Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 244 Austin v Commissioner of Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 [1990] HCA 33 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (1955) 93 CLR 127 Smith v Commissioner of Police & NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Leah Dawn Algie (Applicant)
Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Algie (self represented) Mr Kalyk (the Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate