Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 97

Land and Environment Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 97 Hearing dates: 4 August 2017 Date of orders: 10 August 2017 Decision date: 10 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Molesworth AJ Decision: See orders at [63]-[64] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – judicial review proceedings challenging multiple decisions concerning planning proposal – application for extension of time to challenge particular decisions necessary under rule 59.10 of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 – whether Court should extend time – extension of time granted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 53A, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 123, Div 4 of Pt 3 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land, cl 6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 59.1(1)(b), 59.6, 59.10, Pt 59 Cases Cited: Bankstown City Council v Ramahi [2015] NSWLEC 74 Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52 Gallo v Dawson (1990) 64 ALJR 458; [1990] HCA 30 Liverpool City Council v Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd; Benedict Industries Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 53 O'Connor v New South Wales [2017] NSWSC 598 Re Commonwealth; Ex parte Marks (2000) 75 ALJR 470; [2000] HCA 67 Regional Express Holdings Ltd v Dubbo City Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 113 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd ACN 067 281 083 (Applicant) Tanlane Pty Ltd ACN 057 579 718 (First Respondent) Greater Sydney Commission (Second Respondent) Liverpool City Council (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J E Lazarus (Applicant) Mr T S Hale SC with Mr D Robertson (First Respondent) Submitting appearance (Second and Third Respondents)