NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Woolworths Ltd v McQuillan [2017] NSWCA 202 Hearing dates: 26 July 2017 Date of orders: 14 August 2017 Decision date: 14 August 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1] Gleeson JA at [2] Payne JA at [100] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed.
(2) Set aside the orders made by the District Court on 22 September 2016 and in lieu thereof order:
(a) Amended statement of claim dismissed; (b) Plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs in the District Court.
(3) Respondent to pay the appellant's costs in this Court. Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – liability – respondent fell on a grape in appellant's supermarket – whether finding as to length of time grape was on the floor was supported by the evidence – whether appellant required to establish that its staff were present in the produce area after the supermarket opened - whether primary judge entitled to draw Jones v Dunkel inference against appellant – where primary judge found appellant's system of safety and inspection could not be improved – whether a casual act of negligence – whether appellant's staff failed to keep a proper lookout for hazards on the floor – where primary judge made no finding consistent with negligence by appellant. Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5B(1)(a), (b), (c), 5D Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Australian Safeways Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; [1987] HCA 7 Jackson v McDonald's Australia Ltd [2014] NSWCA 162 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Kocis v SE Dickens Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 408 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services of Australia Ltd & Anor (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352; [1952] HCA 19 Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Ltd (2000) 200 CLR 121; [2000] HCA 18 Strong v Woolworths (2012) 246 CLR 182; [2012] HCA 5 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Woolworths Ltd (ABN 16 151 003 191) (Appellant) Colleen Mary McQuillan (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J.E. Sexton SC/Mr B Wilson (Appellant) Mr R Sheldon SC/Mr J Malouf (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate