NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CZA v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 248 Hearing dates: 31 July 2017 Date of orders: 14 August 2017 Decision date: 14 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Grant, Senior Member Dr B Field, General Member Decision: (1) Declare that the Applicant not be treated as a disqualified person for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 in respect of the two offences of Indecent Assault for which he received a two year recognisance or bond.
(2) Pursuant to s.28(6) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 the Children's Guardian is to grant the Applicant a Working with Children clearance. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – child protection – working with children check clearance – disqualified person – onus of proof - whether applicant is a risk to the safety of children Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Commission for Children and Young People Act 1998 Cases Cited: BHA v Children's Guardian [2014] NWCATAD 161 BKE v Office of Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 Commission for Children and Young People v V (2002) NSWSC 949 BHA v Children's Guardian [2014] NWCATAD 161 Commission for Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 111 CHB v Children's Guardian (2016) NSWCATAD 214 CMA v Children's Guardian (2016) NSWCATAD 264 Smith v Commissioner Police 2014 NSWCATAD 184. Director of Public Prosecution v Smith (1991) VR 6 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CZA (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Dawson (Applicant) J McDonald (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate