NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kennedy v R [2017] NSWCCA 193 Hearing dates: 7 August 2017 Date of orders: 16 August 2017 Decision date: 16 August 2017 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Davies J at [2] Button J at [100] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted.
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – application to withdraw plea – aggravated sexual intercourse without consent where victim under the authority of the applicant - applicant sexually abused stepdaughter – applicant pleaded guilty – applicant represented by solicitor and counsel when plea entered - whether stepdaughter under the applicant's "authority" – whether applicant still in relationship with victim's mother - nothing to impugn the plea – no miscarriage of justice demonstrated – application to withdraw plea refused
CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – appeal against sentence – four counts of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent - applicant sentenced to aggregate term of 17 years' imprisonment – whether sentencing judge failed to give adequate weight to applicant's expression of remorse – whether sentencing judge failed to assess the level of objective seriousness of the offences – whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising charges as offences against a child – whether sentencing judge erred in finding that offences took place in victim's home and that this was an aggravating factor – whether sentence is manifestly excessive – no error of law or principle demonstrated – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Delaney v R; R v Delaney [2013] NSWCCA 150 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Jonson v R [2016] NSWCCA 286 Khamis v R [2014] NSWCCA 152 Langbein v R [2013] NSWCCA 88 Majid v R [2010] NSWCCA 121 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501; [1996] HCA 46 Ming Yuk (Raymond) Wong v Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] NSWSC 129; (2005) 155 A Crim R 37 MM v R [2016] NSWCCA 235 R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 R v Howes (2000) 2 VR 141; [2000] VSCA 159; (2000) 116 A Crim R 249 R v Lulham [2016] NSWCCA 287 R v Miller [2001] NSWCCA 209 R v Van [2002] NSWCCA 148; (2002) 129 A Crim R 229 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roy Noel Kennedy (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Jauncey (Applicant) N Adams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate