NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Chaheh [2017] NSWSC 1061 Hearing dates: 8 September 2016 Date of orders: 15 August 2017 Decision date: 15 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Appeal allowed;
(2) Pursuant to s 59(2) of the Crimes (Appeal And Review) Act 2001 the order of the Local Court made on 7 October 2015 at Burwood Local Court dismissing proceedings against the defendant for the offences of (i) take and drive conveyance without consent of the owner, contrary to s 154A(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900; and (ii) drive whilst disqualified from holding a licence, contrary to s 54(1)(a) of the Road Transport Act 2013 be set aside;
(3) Pursuant to s 59(2) of the Crimes (Appeal And Review) Act 2001 the order of the Local Court made on 7 October 2015 at Burwood Local Court awarding costs against the prosecutor in relation to the proceedings now under appeal, be set aside;
(4) The matter be remitted to Burwood Local Court to be dealt with in accordance with law;
(5) The defendant shall pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – question of law alone – evidence of offence different from particulars of time of offence on Court Attendance Notice – operation of s 16 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 – dismissal of charges by Local Court on that basis involves error of law and ground of appeal involves error of law alone – appeal granted. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Local Court Rules 2009 Road Transport Act 2013 Cases Cited: Carr v Baker (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 301 Day v Rugala [1978] 33 FLR 208 De Romanis v Sibraa [1977] 2 NSWLR 264 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Knight (2006) 162 A Crim R 555; [2006] NSWSC 646 Fabre v Arenales (1992) 27 NSWLR 437 Ilich v R (1987) 162 CLR 110; [1987] HCA 1 John L Pty Ltd v Attorney-General (NSW) (1987) 163 CLR 508; [1987] HCA 42 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Jones v Sutherland Shire Council [1979] 2 NSWLR 206 Lirisitis v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCA 66 Lodhi v R [2006] NSWCCA 101 Morgan v Babcock & Wilcox Ltd (1929) 43 CLR 163; [1929] HCA 25 R v Bogacki [1973] 1 QB 832 R v Stringer (2000) 116 A Crim R 198; [2000] NSWCCA 293 R v VHJ (Court of Criminal Appeal (CCA), 7 July 1996, unrep) The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Plaintiff) Gholam Chaheh (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: DT Kell SC/M Pulsford (Plaintiff) SEJ Prince/S Lawrence (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate