Statewide Planning Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (No.2) [2017] NSWLEC 1440
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Statewide Planning Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council (No.2) [2017] NSWLEC 1440
Hearing dates: 25, 26, July and 19 December 2016, directions for amended plans and conditions 2 March 2017, amended plans and conditions filed 12 July 2017
Date of orders: 16 August 2017
Decision date: 16 August 2017
Jurisdiction: Class 1
Before: Brown C and Dickson C
Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld;
2. Consent is granted to Development Application DA/15/0207 for the development of Lot 1 DP740520, Lot 1 DP 221780 and Lot 12 DP218050, known as 25 Rance Road, Werrington for subdivision of the land to create 83 residential lots, one residue lot, including remediation works, subdivision works, construction of new roads, a roundabout, stormwater drainage works, detention basin and landscaping subject to the conditions attached at Annexure A.
3. The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibit 1, and the applicant's Class 1 Application filed 21 September 2015.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT: residential subdivision – suitability of site - design – stormwater management – compliance with precinct master plan – impact on future development of adjoining lots – directions for filing amended plans and conditions of consent.
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Cases Cited: Statewide Planning Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1133
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Statewide Planning Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Penrith City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
Mr P Tomasetti SC with Mr J Doyle (Applicant)
Mr. N Eastman, barrister (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Hartley Solicitors (Applicant)
Dentons (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/00155219
Publication restriction: No
Judgment
1. COMMISSIONERS: The proceedings are an appeal against the refusal by Penrith City Council of development application DA/15/0207. As originally lodged the application sought approval for 152 residential lots and civil works including a drainage basin on land described as Lot 1 DP740520, Lot 1 DP221780 and Lot 2 DP218959, 25 Rance Road Werrington. (the site).
Background
1. The appeal was heard on 25, 26, July 2016 and 19 December 2016 and the Court made directions for filing of amended plans and conditions in accordance with the findings given on 2 March 2017 (Statewide Planning Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1133). The directions were:
94. The parties are to provide a set of agreed conditions that reflect the findings in the preceding paragraphs within 3 weeks from the date of these findings.
95. Liberty to apply is granted on 48 hours notice if there is any disagreement on the agreed conditions
1. Following a number of Mentions to clarify and give directions to finalise the amended plans and conditions, the agreed amended plans and conditions were filed on 12 July 2017.
Orders
1. The orders of the Court are:
1. The appeal is upheld;
2. Consent is granted to Development Application DA/15/0207 for the development of Lot 1 DP740520 , Lot 1 DP 221780 and Lot 12 DP218050, known as 25 Rance Road, Werrington for subdivision of the land to create 83 residential lots, one residue lot, including remediation works, subdivision works, construction of new roads, a roundabout, stormwater drainage works, detention basin and landscaping subject to the conditions attached at Annexure A.
3. The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibit 1, and the applicant's Class 1 Application filed 21 September 2015.
…………….
G Brown
Commissioner of the Court
…………….
D M Dickson
Commissioner of the Court
155219.16 Brown & Dickson (C) (306 KB, pdf)
155219.16 (Plans) (15.8 MB, pdf)
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 17 August 2017