NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hopkins v Quinn (No 3) [2017] NSWLEC 101 Hearing dates: 30 June 2017; competing Short Minutes of Order on 4 July 2017 (Hopkins' version) and 5 July 2017 (Quinns' version); and (9 August 2017) finalised, settled survey diagram (Annexure A) and works plan (Annexure C) Date of orders: 17 August 2017 Decision date: 17 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Moore J Decision: See Orders commencing at [30]; [30](7) amended according to the slip rule on 21 August 2017 Catchwords: ORDERS - differences between parties as to terms of dispositive orders for the principal proceedings - determination of appropriate terms of contested orders - orders made Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 42 r 1 Cases Cited: Hopkins v Quinn [2016] NSWLEC 163 Hopkins v Quinn [2017] NSWLEC 31 Hopkins v Quinn (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 76 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: John Hopkins (Applicant and First Cross-Defendant) Sally Hopkins (Second Cross-Defendant) David Quinn (First Respondent and First Cross‑Claimant) Maria Quinn (Second Respondent and Second Cross‑Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Eastman, barrister (Applicant and Cross‑Defendants) Mr G Stapleton, barrister (Respondents and Cross‑Claimants)
Solicitors: Hones Lawyers (Applicant and Cross-Defendants) Sattler & Associates (Respondents and Cross‑Claimants) File Number(s): 153093 of 2016 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate