NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hindmarsh v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 254 Hearing dates: 9 February 2017 Date of orders: 17 August 2017 Decision date: 17 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: The decisions are affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW - firearms – revocation of licence – mental health - risk to public safety – public interest. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2006 Mental Health Act 2007 Security Industry Act 1997 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 32; [1990] HCA 33 Barlow v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 254 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSW ADTAP 9 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service, [2001] NSW ADT 50 Davos v Commissioner of Police [2013] NSWADT 7 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 179; (1979) 46 FLR 409 FD v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2008] NSWADT 88 Hughes & Vale Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Lynch v Commissioner of Police [2006] NSW ADTAP 43 Martin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2010] NSWADT 276 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Vella v Commissioner of Police [2003]NSWADT 91 Ward v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSW ADT 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Hindmarsh (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant in person Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00378382, 1610626
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate