NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kohari v NSW Trustee & Guardian (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1080 Hearing dates: 17, 18 July 2017 Date of orders: 18 August 2017 Decision date: 18 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Parker J Decision: Plaintiff to receive legacy of $100,000 from estate of deceased Catchwords: Succession – family provision – applicant son of deceased – adequacy of provision – modest estate – minimum adequate provision for widow – incorrect denial of paternity – "bare paternity" – deceased having obtained family provision from parent's estate – independent and mature adult applicant – provision which ought to be made – relevance of financial "needs" Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 57, 59, 60, 100 Cases Cited: Butler v Morris [2012] NSWSC 748 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242; [1984] HCA 81 Devereaux-Warnes v Hall (No 3) (2007) 35 WAR 127; [2007] WASCA 235 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Henry v Hancock [2016] NSWSC 71 Hughes v National Trustees Executors and Agency Co of Australasia Ltd (1979) 143 CLR 134 Hunter v Hunter (1987) 8 NSWLR 573 Nicholls v Hall [2007] NSWCA 356 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253; [2013] NSWSC 522 Underwood v Gaudron [2015] NSWCA 269 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191; [2005] HCA 11 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Kohari (Plaintiff) NSW Trustee & Guardian (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F Austin (Plaintiff) D Stewart (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate