NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Noack [2017] NSWSC 1088 Hearing dates: 4 August 2017 Date of orders: 04 August 2017 Decision date: 04 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hamill J Decision: Extended Supervision Order made (see paragraph [35]) Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – whether defendant is a high risk violent offender – application for extended detention order – final orders – where interim supervision order made and upheld on appeal – where defendant compliant with interim order – resource issues arising from defendant's location in remote rural community – obligation on state to provide resources – where caseworkers committed and motivated – caseworkers commended – extended detention order not justified – extended supervision order made. Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General of New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWSC 605 Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 4) [2017] NSWCA 189 State of New South Wales v Anderson [2015] NSWSC 1515 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Noack [2017] NSWCA 144 State of New South Wales v Noack [2017] NSWSC 782 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Justin Peter Noack (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Craddock SC; C McGorey (Plaintiff) D O'Neil (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate