NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Farrugia [2017] NSWCCA 197 Hearing dates: 14 August 2017 Date of orders: 14 August 2017 Decision date: 21 August 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Button J at [24]; Hamill J at [25] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal.
(2) Dismiss the application for judge alone trial. Catchwords: CRIME – interlocutory appeal – Director's appeal from order for judge alone trial – whether in interests of justice to order trial without jury – proposed cross-examination of victim might reveal accused was refused bail – lack of evidence of likely prejudice – assessment speculative – failure to consider whether risk capable of amelioration by directions Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 59, 112 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 32, 131, 132, 132A Criminal Procedure Legislation (Amendment) Act 1990 (NSW), Sch 1(2) Cases Cited: Arthurs v Western Australia [2007] WASC 182 Coates v Western Australia [2009] WASCA 142 Fittock v The Queen (2003) 217 CLR 508; [2003] HCA 19 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 R v Belghar (2012) 217 A Crim R 1; [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v Coles (1993) 31 NSWLR 550 R v Fardon [2010] QCA 317 R v Perry (1993) 29 NSWLR 589 R v Qaumi & Ors (No 14) [2016] NSWSC 274 R v Qaumi & Qaumi [2016] NSWSC 1473 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 259; 249 A Crim R 120 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 Redman v R [2015] NSWCCA 110 RKF v R [2016] NSWCCA 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Applicant) Paul Charles Bruce Farrugia (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Dowling SC (Applicant) Mr P McGrath SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate