NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Popovic; R v Koloamatangi (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 1110 Hearing dates: 21 August 2017 Decision date: 22 August 2017 Before: N Adams J Decision: The application to discharge the jury is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder trial – application to discharge jury – where widow of deceased gave evidence that the deceased had visited the accused Popovic in gaol – whether high degree of necessity to discharge the jury Cases Cited: Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427; [1996] HCA 22 Gilbert v R (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 Mikael v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 294 R v Ahola (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 703 R v Bartle (2003) 181 FLR 1; [2003] NSWCCA 329 R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592 R v Hunter (No 8) [2014] NSWSC 1151 R v Mark William Helmhout & Anor [2000] NSWSC 218 R v Qaumi (No 40) [2016] NSWSC 807 R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 34) [2016] NSWSC 259 R v Scott (No 1) [2015] NSWSC 458 Santo v R [2009] NSWCCA 269 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Zlatan Popovic (Accused) Tevi Koloamatangi (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Barrett (Crown) Mr L Brasch (Accused Popovic) Ms C Davenport SC (Accused Koloamatangi)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Toomey Lawyers (Accused Popovic) Katsoolis & Co (Accused Koloamatangi) File Number(s): 2012/00232565; 2012/00370471
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate