NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Marshall v Fleming [2017] NSWSC 1107 Hearing dates: 1 May – 9 May 2017 Decision date: 24 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Payne JA Decision: The Court makes the following orders:
1. Amended statement of claim dated 22 November 2016 is dismissed;
2. The plaintiffs to pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW – doctrine of indemnification under the common law of New York –dispute over distribution of settlement funds from proceedings determined in Pennsylvania
PROCEDURE – case which was not pleaded or the subject of opening address identified for the first time in closing submissions – whether plaintiff permitted to rely on such a case Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Brown v Rosenbaum, 4INE 2d 77 (NY 1942); 287 NY 510 Bunker v. Bunker, 80 A.D.2d 817 (NY App. Div. 1st Dep't, 1981) C.K. Industries Corp v C.M. Industries Corp, 213 A.D.2d 846 (1995) Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Amcor Limited (No 3) [2008] FCA 1668 Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Lamesa Holdings BV (1997) 77 FCR 579; [1997] FCA 785 Commissioner of Taxation v Normandy Finance and Investments Asia Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 180 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658; [1982] HCA 70 Fleming v Marshall (2011) 279 ALR 737; [2011] NSWCA 86 Fleming v Marshall [2011] NSWCA 86 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Marshall v Carruthers; Marshall v Marshall [2002] NSWCA 47 Marshall v Carruthers; Marshall v Marshall [2002] NSWCA 47 Marshall v Fleming [2010] NSWSC 86 Marshall v Fleming [2014] NSWCA 64 Marshall v Prescott (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1949 Marshall v Prescott [2015] NSWCA 110 McDermott v City of New York, 50 N.Y. 2d 211 (1980) Peter Sleiman Investments Pty Ltd as trustee for the Sleiman Family Trust v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2017] NSWCA 81 Regie Nationale Renault v Zhang (2002) 210 CLR 491; [2002] HCA 10 Southwick v Moore Stephens Melbourne Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 164 Sutch v Sutch-Lenz, 129 A.D 3d 1137 (2015) Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491; [1988] HCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Margaret Lesley Marshall (First plaintiff) Kim Neil Marshall (Second plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate