NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Egan v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 206 Hearing dates: 26 July 2017 Decision date: 28 August 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] McCallum J at [2] Bellew J at [44] Decision: Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – where offender suffering from mental illness – where evidence as to mental illness unchallenged – whether sentencing judge confined consideration of the applicant's mental health to an assessment of the objective criminality of the offending and hardship in custody Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 97, 105A, 112 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44(2) Cases Cited: Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Benitez v R [2006] NSWCCA 21 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194; 79 NSWLR 1 Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dale Lee Egan (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Francis (applicant) H Roberts (respondent)
Solicitors: Randall Legal (applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2014/340795 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 4 April 2016 Before: Wells J SC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate