NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bell v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 207 Hearing dates: 26 & 29 May 2017 Date of orders: 29 May 2017 Decision date: 28 August 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ McCallum J N Adams J Decision: 1. Grant the applicant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Quash the convictions of the applicant. 4. Enter verdicts of acquittal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal and new trial – whether verdict unreasonable or insupportable having regard to evidence – whether certain utterances could constitute admissions pursuant to s 81 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – consideration of the course of trial Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61I, 61L, 344A(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(1) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 133(1), 159, 293 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 38, 39, 42, 81(1) Cases Cited: Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kenneth Bell (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Coady (Applicant) N Williams (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/132092 Publication restriction: Statutory non-publication order re identity of complainant Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 3 June 2016 Before: Herbert DCJ File Number(s): 2013/132092
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate