NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: National Bank Australia Limited v Viziteu [2017] NSWSC 1125 Hearing dates: 24 August 2017 Date of orders: 24 August 2017 Decision date: 24 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: The plaintiff's application for an extension of time for service of the statement of claim is refused. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – originating process – validity for service – extension of time – originating process served when stale – default judgment obtained – application to extend time for service - whether judgment entered irregularly – whether extension of time for service could be obtained without setting aside judgment – application refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Arnold v Forsythe [2012] NSWCA 18 Arthur Andersen Corporate Finance Pty Ltd v Buzzle Operations Pty Ltd (in liq) [2009] NSWCA 104 Berger Investments Group Limited v Coccoon Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 1015 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Kingston Bake Pty Ltd (Rothman J, 11 February 2016, Unrep) FAI General Insurance Co Limited v Southern Cross Exploration NL (1988) 165 CLR 268 Judd v Warwick [2007] NSWDC 299 Zakaria v Dr Noyce [2012] NSWSC 981 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: National Australia Bank Limited (Plaintiff) Vasile Viziteu (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: I Mir (Plaintiff) No appearance (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate