NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AAP Industries Pty Ltd v Rehau Pte Ltd (No. 2) [2017] NSWSC 1136 Hearing dates: 23 August 2017 Date of orders: 31 August 2017 Decision date: 31 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $240,166.
(2) The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT – damages – contract for the supply of plumbing articles – defendant liable for breach of supply agreement – parties agreed on loss of profits and loss in respect of completed stock – loss in respect of raw materials in issue – whether cost of mitigation of damages is recoverable – date at which damages should be assessed
COSTS – whether costs should be awarded other than on the ordinary basis – Calderbank offer made by defendant – conditions attached to offer - plaintiff not unreasonable in rejecting offer – whether order under r 42.34 UCPR should be made – defendant is a foreign corporation – contractual term involving foreign jurisdiction - proceedings appropriately commenced in Supreme Court – proceedings thereafter appropriately continued in Supreme Court – whether s 60 Civil Procedure Act applies to costs orders - plaintiff's conduct in the proceedings did not give rise to any issues of proportionality Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: AAP Industries Pty Limited v Rehau Pte Limited [2015] NSWSC 468 AAP Industries Pty Ltd v Rehau Pte Ltd [2017] NSWSC 390 Colonial Ammunition Co v Reid (1900) 21 NSWR 338 Falkner v Bourke (1990) 19 NSWLR 574 Haines v Bendall (1991) 172 CLR 60 Hammond & Co v Bussey (1887) 20 QBD 79 Jones v Krawczyk (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 352 Jones v Sutton [No. 2] [2005] NSWCA 203 M.B.P (S.A) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657 McLaughlin v Dungowan Manly Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 306 Milich v The Council of the City of Canterbury (No. 3) [2012] NSWSC 1280 Perri v Flavell (No 2) (Court of Appeal, 20 Sep 1995, Unrep) Priestley v Priestley (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1259 Sabah Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 306 Sheahan v Stockman (1922) 22 SR (NSW) 415 State of New South Wales v Quirk [2012] NSWCA 216 Whitehouse Hotels Pty Ltd v Lido Savoy Pty Ltd (1975) 49 ALJR 93 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: AAP Industries Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Rehau Pte Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Zammit (Plaintiff) M J Heath (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate