NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mackie v SAS Trustee Corporation [2017] NSWDC 232 Hearing dates: 10 – 13, 20 April 2017 Date of orders: 20 April 2017 Decision date: 20 April 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Set aside the decision of the Defendant made on 25 February 2016 and determine that the Plaintiff's pension allowance be increased from 72.75% at the date of her medical discharge to 81.94%.
Determination that that pension become payable from 16 March 2012.
Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: POLICE SUPERANNUATION – Application to increase superannuation entitlement – when should pension increase commence? Legislation Cited: Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 Cases Cited: Carswell v SAS Trustee Corporation [2014] NSWDC 47 Daley v SASTC [2015] NSWDC 183; (2015) 20 DCLR(NSW) 362 Daley v SASTC [2016] NSWCA 111 Daley v SASTC (No 2) [2016] NSWDC 285 Lembcke v SASTC [2003] NSWCA 136; (2003) 56 NSWLR 736; (2003) 25 NSWCCR 464 Moss v SASTC (No 2) [2016] NSWDC 287 Swift v SASTC [2010] NSWCA 182 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Virginia Suzanne Mackie (Plaintiff) SAS Trustee Corporation (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P O'Rourke (Plaintiff) T Ower (Defendant)
Solicitors: Walter Madden Jenkins (Plaintiff) Lorianna Ower (Defendant) File Number(s): RJ 374/16 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate