DDR v Lifestyle Solutions (Aust) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAD 266

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DDR v Lifestyle Solutions (Aust) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAD 266 Hearing dates: 17 August 2017 Date of orders: 31 August 2017 Decision date: 31 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Anderson, Senior Member Decision: 1. The application for stay or interim order filed 19 June 2017 is dismissed.

2. The matter is to be listed in the next available directions list. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW- where administratively reviewable decision – where decision to remove from an authorised carer the responsibility for the daily care and control of children - whether stay or other order is desirable - whether to grant an order or interim stay under section 60, 61, 62 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW). Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Community Services (Complaints, Reviews and Monitoring) Act 1993 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: 1st Fleet Pty Ltd v Australian Co-Operative Foods Ltd [2006] NSWSC 881 AQY & AQZ v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 1028 AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 81 Elgammal v Director General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 82 Goode & Goode [2006] FamCA 1346; (2006) FLC ¶93-286 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Limited [2010] HCA 32 New South Wales Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 95 Polini v Gray (1879) 12 Ch D 438 S v Minister for Youth and Community Services (1986) 10 FamLR 849 Ye v Commissioner for Fair Trading; Ucer Investments and Resources Management Pty Ltd v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 147 YG & GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: DDR and DDS (Applicants) Lifestyle Solutions (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: DDR and DDS (Applicants self-represented) Care Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00219727 Publication restriction: Pursuant to section 65 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 a person must not, except with the consent of the Tribunal, whether before or after the proceedings are disposed of, publish or broadcast the name of any person who appears as a witness before the Tribunal in any proceedings, or to whom any proceedings in the Tribunal relate, or who is mentioned or otherwise involved in any proceedings in the Tribunal.Note that a reference to the name of a person includes a reference to any information, picture or other material that identifies the person or is likely to lead to the identification of the person.