NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: NU v NSW Secretary of Family and Community Services [2017] NSWCA 221 Hearing dates: 27 July 2017 Decision date: 04 September 2017 Before: Beazley P at [1]; McColl JA at [85]; Schmidt J at [86] Decision: Summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE – child welfare under State legislation – proceedings under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) – where allegation that father had sexually abused daughter – appropriate test to be applied in cases involving custody or access to a child – whether inability of court to make positive finding of abuse determinative of the ultimate question of whether unacceptable risk of harm to child – M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69; [1988] HCA 68
EVIDENCE – standard of proof – proceedings under the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) – where allegation that father had sexually abused daughter – application of Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 – application of Briginshaw standard
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – denial of procedural fairness – rule in Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 – significance of witness being on notice of allegation – whether absence of cross-examination on particulars of allegation precluded finding of unacceptable risk of harm to the child Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW), ss 8, 9, 60, 71, 72, 78, 79, 80, 83, 91, 93, 96 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Cases Cited: Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 1 NSWLR 1 Bradley v Matloob [2015] NSWCA 239 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Director General of Community Services; Re Sophie [2008] NSWCA 250 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69; [1988] HCA 68 Masterton Homes Pty Ltd v Palm Assets Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 234 R v Prasad (1979) 23 SASR 161 RCR Tomlinson Ltd v Russell [2015] WASCA 154 Re Felicity; FM v Secretary of Department of Family and Community Services (No 3) [2014] NSWCA 226 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57; [2001] HCA 22 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82; [2000] HCA 57 SAMM Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Shaye Properties Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 132 The Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services and the Harper Children [2016] NSWChC 3 V V v District Court of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 469 West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161 Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (in liq) v Darling Harbour Authority (1991) 24 NSWLR 156 Category: Principal judgment Parties: NU (Applicant) NSW Secretary of Family and Community Services (First Respondent) Independent Legal Representative for the Child (Second Respondent) KU (Third Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Coleman SC; L Clarke (Applicant) G Mahony (First Respondent) K Reynolds (Second Respondent) G Hill (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate