NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stevens v R [2017] NSWCCA 216 Hearing dates: 30 August 2017 Date of orders: 06 September 2017 Decision date: 06 September 2017 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Davies J at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: Criminal law – Appeal – Sentence – Charge of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm – Where applicant struck the victim from behind in an unprovoked attack causing the victim to fall to the ground and lose consciousness – Where victim suffered a number of injuries including a haemorrhagic contusion of the brain, a fracture of the orbital wall and a laceration to the left forehand – Where victim left with permanent scarring, intermittent headaches, flashbacks, nightmares and rapid mood swings – Whether the sentencing Judge erred in his categorisation of the injuries – Whether sentence was manifestly excessive – No error on the part of the sentencing Judge – Necessity to bear in mind that the injury is not the sole determining factor of sentence for this type of offending – Sentence not manifestly excessive – Leave to appeal granted – Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Mitchell; R v Gallagher [2007] NSWCCA 296 R v McCulloch [2009] NSWCCA 94 AM v R [2012] NSWCCA 203 R v Zhang [2004] NSWCCA 358 R v Woods NSWCCA 9 October 1990 unreported Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Troy Richard Stevens – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: T Gartelmann SC – Applicant F Veltro - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate