NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Schofield v Serenity 5 Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1168 Hearing dates: 31 August 2017 Date of orders: 31 August 2017 Decision date: 01 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: Leave to rely on expert reports granted. Hearing dates vacated. Parties to confer as to a further timetable and as to the appropriate costs order. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – personal injury – notice of motion – expert reports – order sought for expert reports to be excluded from being admitted at the hearing and in the alternative, the hearing be vacated – Rule 31.28 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – exceptional circumstances – leave sought to rely on expert reports granted – hearing dates vacated – costs – reasons Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ho v Professional Services Review Committee No 295 [2007] FCA 388 Oreb v Willcock (2005) 146 FCR 237; [2005] FCAFC 196 San v Rumble (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 259 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Phillip Stanley Schofield (Plaintiff) Serenity 5 Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr SE McCarthy, counsel (Plaintiff) Mr N Polin SC (Defendant)
Solicitors: Shine Lawyers (Plaintiff) Moray & Agnew Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2014/371744 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate