NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dickens v State of New South Wales & Ors [2017] NSWSC 1173 Hearing dates: 9 August 2017 Date of orders: 05 September 2017 Decision date: 05 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: Proceedings dismissed as against second and third defendants as disclosing no cause of action. Statement of claim dismissed as against first defendant with leave to re-plead, subject to limitations. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – application to strike out statement of claim – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 14.28 – form of pleading embarrassing and prejudicial to defendant – leave granted to re-plead.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary dismissal – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.4 – no maintainable cause of action disclosed – collateral attack on judgement and orders of the Family Court.
TORTS – intentional tort – Wilkinson v Downton – alleged mental and emotional harm arising from making and enforcement of Family Court orders – whether defendants liable for procuring Family Court orders – collateral attack on Family Court orders not permissible – advocate's immunity – no recognised psychiatric illness Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers [2016] HCA 16 Bunyan v Jordan (1937) 57 CLR 1 Bynoe v. Bank of England [1902] 1 KB 467 Cabassi v Vila (1940) 64 CLR 130; [1940] HCA 41 Cachia v Westpac Financial Services Ltd [2005] NSWCA 239 Clavel v Savage [2013] NSWSC 775 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1; [2005] HCA 12 Giller v Procopets (2008) 24 VR1; [2008] VSCA 236 IEL Finance Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 898 Janvier v Sweeney [1919] 2 KB 316 Kirby v Sanderson Motors Pty Ltd (2001) 54 NSWLR 135; [2002] NSWCA 44 Magill v Magill (2006) 226 CLR 551; [2006] HCA 51 Markisic v Department of Community Services of New South Wales [2005] NSWSC 1373 Markisic v Department of Community Services of New South Wales (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 321 Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Naidu (2007) 71 NSWLR 471; [2007] NSWCA 377 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 Stevens v Rowe (1880) 47 Am Rep 231 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317; [2002] HCA 35 Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Dickens (plaintiff) State of New South Wales (first defendant) Nicola Mary Adams (second defendant) Paddy James Moylan (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Dickens (plaintiff, in person) Mr Edward Anderson (first defendant) Mr David Lloyd (second defendant) Mr Bruce McClintock SC/Mr Patrick Meagher (third defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate