NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Andrew James Munro v Water Administration Ministerial Corporation in the name of the Department of Primary Industries Office of Water [2017] NSWLEC 1494 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 28 January, 30 March, 5 July, 30 November 2016, 16 May and 30 August 2017 Date of orders: 06 September 2017 Decision date: 06 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Adam AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: LICENCE APPLICATION UNDER WATER ACT 1912: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 The Water Act 1912 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew James Munro (Applicant) Water Administration Ministerial Corporation Water Administration Ministerial Corporation (Respondent) Representation: Solicitor: Mr N Pragnell, Case Law Lawyers (Applicant) Mr M Dalla-Pozza, Crown Solicitors (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/161721 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. Pursuant to s.11(4) of the Water Act 1912, the applicant be granted a licence under the Water Act 1912 in respect of the earthen embankment constructed across Nowlands Creek Wards on Mistake Station, Lot 5 and 29 of Deposited Plan 751483 (as shown on a plan retained in the Water NSW office Grafton). This licence is subject to the conditions set out in Annexure "A" and the supporting documents Annexures B, C and D. 3. No order as to costs. ………………………. Acting Commissioner Adam Annexure A (147 KB, pdf) Annexure B (899 KB, pdf) Annexure C (194 KB, pdf) Annexure D (854 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 06 September 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate