NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Fernandez [2017] NSWSC 1197 Hearing dates: 15 May 2017 Decision date: 07 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Simpson J Decision: (1) The Commissioner's summons, so far as it claims a forfeiture order under s 49(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), is dismissed;
(2) The Commissioner is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CRIME – proceeds of crime – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) – application for forfeiture orders – exercise of discretion to refuse a forfeiture order – property identified as interest in bank account – chose in action – nature of chose in action – whether chose in action is proceeds of crime – whether chose in action is instrument of serious offence – whether property ceased to be proceeds or instrument of crime – acquisition of property – whether forfeiture order is in the "public interest"
CRIME – proceeds of crime – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) – application for compensation order – property instrument of crime Legislation Cited: Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Finance Act 2006 (Cth), ss 5, 6, 43, 142, Criminal Code (Cth), s 400.9, Pt 10.2 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 5, 19, 29, 30, 49, 73, 77, 78, 180, 317, 329, 330, 336, 338 Cases Cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; [1990] HCA 21 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Lordianto [2017] NSWSC 1196 Courtenay Investments Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2012] WASCA 121 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473; [1985] HCA 29 Hogan v Hinch (2011) 243 CLR 506; [2011] HCA 4 O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210; [1989] HCA 61 Osland v Secretary, Dept of Justice (2008) 234 CLR 275; [2008] HCA 37 Pereira v The Queen (1988) 35 A Crim R 382 R v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464; [1985] HCA 22 Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (NSW) v Browning (1947) 74 CLR 492; [1947] HCA 21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Rommy Fernandez (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: V O'Halloran (Plaintiff) M McCarthy (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate