NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Senior v R [2017] NSWCCA 220 Hearing dates: 4 September 2017 Date of orders: 04 September 2017 Decision date: 11 September 2017 Before: Basten JA at [1]; McCallum J at [41]; Wilson J at [42] Decision: Refuse the applicant leave to appeal against conviction. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – application for leave to appeal convictions for dangerous driving – convictions based on guilty pleas – whether pleas attributable to genuine consciousness of guilt – whether pleas entered without full understanding of consequences – whether miscarriage of justice
CRIME – appeal – challenge to conviction based on guilty pleas – whether advice of applicant's legal representative to enter guilty pleas was imprudent and inappropriate – whether incompetence of counsel resulted in miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Cases Cited: R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Ignjatic (1993) 68 A Crim R 333 Liberti (1991) 55 A Crim R 120 McLean v R [2001] NSWCCA 58; 121 A Crim R 484 Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132; [1995] HCA 41 R v Murphy [1965] VR 187 Reg v Chiron [1980] 1 NSWLR 218 Regina v SL [2004] NSWCCA 397 Wilkes v R [2001] NSWCCA 97; 122 A Crim R 310 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Neville Senior (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Dr S Baron Levi (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate