NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Residents Against Intermodal Development Moorebank Incorporated v Minister for Planning [2017] NSWLEC 115 Hearing dates: 7 August 2017 Date of orders: 12 September 2017 Decision date: 12 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Preston CJ Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The second respondent's notice of motion filed on 7 June 2017 is dismissed. (2) The second respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the motion. Catchwords: PARTIES – appeal by an objector – standing of applicant – applicant an incorporated association – unincorporated body made submission objecting to designated development – unincorporated body an objector – whether incorporated association had right of unincorporated body to appeal – challenge to standing of applicant dismissed Legislation Cited: Associations Incorporation Act 2009 ss 4, 6, 7, 8(2), 39, Sch 2 cl 2(1)(b) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4, 5(c), 79, 81(1), 98(1) Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 3.7(3) Cases Cited: Re Application by Emergency Medical Services Protection Association (NSW) (2013) 233 IR 400; [2013] NSWIRComm 35 Benbrika v The Queen (2010) 29 VR 593; [2010] VSCA 281 Cameron v Hogan (1934) 51 CLR 358; [1934] HCA 24 Clarke v Australian Labor Party (1999) 74 SASR 109; [1999] SASC 365 Conservative Office v Burrell [1982] 1 WLR 522 Kibby v Registrar of Titles [1999] 1 VR 861; [1998] VSC 148 Macaulay v O'Donnell [1943] 1 Ch 435 Peckham v Moore [1975] 1 NSWLR 353 Quikfund (Australia) Pty Ltd v Prosperity Group International Pty Ltd (In Liq) (2013) 209 FCR 368; [2013] FCAFC 5 Re Price [1943] Ch 422 Re Thackrah [1939] 2 All ER 4 Texts Cited: NSW Fair Trading and NSW Department of Finance & Services, Associations Incorporation Act 2009 – Statutory Review, (2 November 2015) NSW Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 4 March 2009 at 12908 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Residents Against Intermodal Development Moorebank Incorporated (Applicant) Minister for Planning (First Respondent) Qube Holdings Limited (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Clay SC (Applicant) Ms J Wood (solicitor) (First Respondent) Dr A S Bell SC with Ms Z Heger (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate