NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cunningham v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 222 Hearing dates: 22 May 2017 Decision date: 13 September 2017 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Hoeben CJ at CL at [2] McCallum J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – sentencing – strong subjective case – where offender sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment to be served by way of intensive correction order – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to impose a non-custodial sentence
CRIME – appeals – sentencing – manifest excess – whether sentence imposed was within the permissible exercise of the sentencing judge's discretion Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 5(1), 12 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25(1), 29 Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Liam Cunningham (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Coady (applicant) N Adams (respondent)
Solicitors: Brenda Duchen Solicitor (applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2015/178800 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court NSW Jurisdiction: Crime Citation: [2017] NSWDC 106 Date of Decision: 27 January 2017 Before: Berman DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate