NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shoebridge v Office of Environment and Heritage [2017] NSWCATAD 275 Hearing dates: 29 May 2017 Date of orders: 13 September 2017 Decision date: 13 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: The reviewable decision is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – access to information – reviewable decisions – processing charges – estimate of processing charges – advance deposit – discount – special public interest – timing of decision – in the nature of preliminary decision – whether discount applied to advance deposit – deemed refusal Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Adco Constructions Pty Ltd v Goudappel & Anor [2014] HCA 18; (2014) 308 ALR 213 Bridge Shipping Pty Ltd v Grand Shipping SA (1991) HCA 45, 173 CLR 231 Commissioner of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55 Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 56 Hardman v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2003] NSWCA 130 IW v City of Perth [1997] HCA 30; 191 CLR 1; (1997) 94 LGERA 224; (1997) 146 ALR 696; (1997) 71 ALJR 943 Minister Administering the Crown Lands ACT v Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council (No 2) [2001] NSWCA 28 National Tertiary Education Union v Southern Cross University [2015] NSWCATAD 151 Page v Southern Cross University [2016] NSWCATAD 199 Public Service Assn v Premier's Department [2002] NSWADT 277 Shoebridge v Forestry Corporation of NSW [2016] NSWCATAD 93 Texts Cited: Guideline 2- Discounting processing charges, Information Privacy Commission, December 2016 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Shoebridge (Applicant) Office of Environment and Heritage (Respondent) Information Commissioner (Intervenor) Representation: Solicitors: D Shoebridge (Applicant in person) Office of Environment and Heritage (Respondent) Information and Privacy Commission (Intervenor) File Number(s): 2016/00378406, 1610651
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate