NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sutcliffe v Hennessy [2017] NSWCATCD 77 Hearing dates: 18 July 2017 Decision date: 21 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G.J. Sarginson, Senior Member Decision: 1. The residential tenancy agreement between the applicant and the respondent in respect of the residential premises 'the Shed' at [***] WORLDS END NSW 2850 is terminated under Section 85 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 on 1 November 2017, and the respondent is to give vacant possession on that date. Catchwords: Residential Tenancies---Oral agreement between family members---Whether residential tenancy exists---Termination of residential tenancy Legislation Cited: Residential Tenancies Act 2010 ss 3, 7, 9, 9, 13, 85, 119, 223 Regulation Tenancies Regulation 2010 Reg 19, 22 Cases Cited: Cohen-Hallaleah v Cyril Rosenbaum Synagogue [2003] NSWSC 395 Church of England Homes Burwood Inc v Muldoon [2008] NSWCTTT 1329 McLeod v McLeod [1999] NSWRT 32 King v Cursten Pty Ltd [2012] QCATA 127 Grundel v Registrar General (1990) NSW ConvR 55-548 at 59,056 Buono v Mazzella [2012] NSWCTTT 479 Ermogenuous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; (2002) 209 CLR 95 Darmanin v Cowan [2010] NSWSC 1118 Lawrence v Gunner [2015] NSWSC 944 Ashton v Pratt (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 3 MacPhail v MacPhail [2017] NSWSC 942 Dayeian v Davidson [2010] NSWCA 42 Franklins v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Geoffrey Keith Sutcliffe (applicant) Bruce Phillip Hennessy (respondent) Representation: E Gordon Solicitor for the applicant Respondent in person File Number(s): RT 17/11740 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate