NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Patrick v The Martinez HWL Practice trust t/as HWL Ebsworth Lawyers [2017] NSWCATAD 277 Hearing dates: 8 August 2017 Date of orders: 15 September 2017 Decision date: 15 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member Decision: Application to amend the complaint, to include the period before 12 February 2015, is refused. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – Equal Opportunity – Power of tribunal to amend a complaint under s 103 of the Anti-discrimination act 1977
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION – interpreting conflicting provisions within a statute
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application of the "guiding principle" under the Civil and Administrative Decisions Act 2013 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Decisions Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 62 (2007) 159 FCR 181 Mihnyak v Woolworths Limited [2012] NSWADT 219 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Ross v The Queen [1979] HCA 29; (1979) 141 CLR 432 The Commissioner of Stamps (SA) v Telegraph Investment Co Pty Ltd [1995] HCA 44; (1995) 184 CLR 453 at 479 Thompson v Rail Corporation NSW [2008] NSWADT 329 Texts Cited: DC Pearce and RS Geddes "Statutory Interpretation in Australia" (8th ed, 2014) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Elizabeth Patrick (applicant) The Martinez HWL Practice trust t/as HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (first respondent) Juan Martinez (second respondent) Michael Bowyer (third respondent) Nicholas Matkovich (fourth respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate