NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Strathfield Municipal Council v Michael Raad Architect Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 119 Hearing dates: 15, 17 and 22 August 2017 Date of orders: 23 August 2017 Decision date: 23 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [49] Catchwords: INTERLOCUTORY INJUCTION – works allegedly undertaken not in accordance with development consent – whether there is a serious question to be tried – whether the balance of convenience favours the injunction Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 121B, 123 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 64 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57; [2006] HCA 46 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618; [1968] HCA 1 Blacktown City Council v Penatrators Pty Ltd [2013] NSWLEC 169; (2013) 199 LGERA 73 Hunters Hill Council v Fraser [2006] NSWLEC 744 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) (1998) 195 CLR 1; [1998] HCA 30 Ross v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1987) 70 LGRA 91 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 Shoalhaven City Council v Bridgewater Investments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 103 Strathfield Municipal Council v Michael Raad Architect Pty Ltd (No 1) [2017] NSWLEC 105 Tegra (NSW) Pty Ltd v Gundagai Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 806; (2007) 160 LGERA 1 Tenterfield Shire Council v Budd [2016] NSWLEC 89 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Strathfield Municipal Council (Applicant) Rail Corporation New South Wales (Intervenor) Michael Raad Architect Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Hallmark Construction Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Telmet Ventures Pty Limited (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C J Leggat SC with Dr J Smith (Applicant) A M Pickles SC (Intervenor) R P L Lancaster SC (First, Second and Third Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate