NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barram v State of New South Wales [2017] NSWDC 255 Hearing dates: 2, 5 – 9 June 2017 Date of orders: 09 June 2017 Decision date: 09 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Verdict and judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff
Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on the ordinary basis until 24 May 2017 and on the indemnity basis from 25 May 2017 Catchwords: CIVIL – police torts claim – trespass to land, assault and false imprisonment – whether police entry to P's dwelling was lawful – whether arrest was lawful – LEPRA ss 99 and 202 Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 Law Reform (Vicarious Liability) Act 1983 Cases Cited: Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573 Johnstone v State of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 70; 2002 A Crim R 422 R v Le [2005] NSWCCA 40; 151 A Crim R 564 R v Rondo [2001] NSWCCA 540; 126 A Crim R 562 State of New South Wales v Randall [2017] NSWCA 88 Tilse v State of New South Wales [2013] NSWDC 265 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gregory Barram (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Maher (Plaintiff) Mr M Gollan (Defendant)
Solicitors: MPB Lawyers (Plaintiff) McCabes Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/226288 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate