NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lopatinsky v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 227 Hearing dates: 20 April 2017 Decision date: 20 September 2017 Before: Simpson JA at [1] McCallum J at [2] Fagan J at [31] Decision: Leave to appeal granted; sentence imposed in the District Court set aside and, in substitution therefor, applicant sentenced to a term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months commencing on 6 March 2015 and expiring on 5 September 2019 and a balance of term of 2 years and 3 months expiring on 5 December 2021 Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – sentence – disparity – where both offenders sentenced by same judge at different times – consideration of sentencing judge's finding that co-offender was marginally less involved than applicant in commission of offence – whether applicant has justifiable sense of grievance Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2), sch 1 Cases Cited: Kemp v R [2012] NSWCCA 281 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Lopatinsky (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Hughes (applicant) P Coady (respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid (NSW) (applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2015/69934 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Crime Date of Decision: 15 June 2016 Before: Bennett SC DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate