NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vasiliades v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1514 Hearing dates: 4 – 5 September 2017 Date of orders: 20 September 2017 Decision date: 20 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The orders of the Court are:
1.The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans; 2. No order as to costs; 3. The appeal is dismissed; 4. Development application DA-560/2016 for consent for a four storey mixed use development comprising ground floor retail, basement parking and three levels of boarding rooms at 118 Duntroon Street and 36 Floss Street, Hurlstone Park is refused; 5. The exhibits are returned with the exception of exhibits 1, A, and B. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL: boarding house development – whether compatible with the character of the locality – proposed heritage conservation area – acceptability of the fourth storey – weight given to draft local environmental plan – desired future character – likely impacts of the development unacceptable. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 79C, 97B Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, regs 2A, 3, 97A, Pts 1 and 6 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009, cll 29, 30, 30A State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: (BASIX) 2004 Canterbury Development Control Plan 2012, Pts 1 and 3 Cases Cited: Benson McCormack Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2015] NSWLEC 1019 Cachia v Manly Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 1107 Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2009) 169 LGERA 153; [2009] NSWLEC 153 Marinkovic v Rockdale City Council (2007) 151 LGERA 385; [2007] NSWLEC 71 Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191. Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 195 ; [2003] NSWCA 289 Trinvass Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 151 Veloshin v Randwick Council [2007] NSWLEC 428 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589; (2001) 115 LGERA 373; [2001] NSWCA 167 Texts Cited: Sydenham to Bankstown Urban Renewal Corridor Draft Strategy Category: Principal judgment Parties: Constantine and Anthony Vasiliades (Applicants) City of Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Pickles SC (Applicant) Solicitors: Mr C Zoppo, Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent) Mr V Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant) File Number(s): 2017/00027266 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate