NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Gerald Polorotov [2017] NSWSC 1266 Hearing dates: 1 September 2017 Date of orders: 29 September 2017 Decision date: 29 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The claim for judicial review fails. (2) The summons filed 1 June 2017 is dismissed. (3) The plaintiff is to pay the first defendant's costs on an ordinary basis. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 – challenge to the assessment of a State Insurance Regulatory Authority Claims Assessor for damages – whether the Claims Assessor erred in law in finding there was no exercisable residual earning capacity - whether the Claims Assessor failed to explain the actual path of reasoning by which he reached his conclusion – whether the Claims Assessor failed to engage with the insurer's argument – whether there was a denial of procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Accident Compensation Act 1985 (Vic) MAA Claims Assessment Guidelines MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines, 1 October 2007 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Crazzi (2006) 68 NSWLR 266 Insurance Australia Limited Ltd trading as NRMA Insurance v Hutton-Potts (2010) 57 MVR 194 Kallouf v Middis [2008] NSWCA 61 McGinn v Ashfield Council [2012] NSWCA 238 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Pham v NRMA (2014) 66 MVR 152 Walsh v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 255; (2007) 161 LGERA 118 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480 Zahed v IAG Limited t/as NRMA Insurance and Others (2016) NSWCA 55; 75 MVR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited (Plaintiff) Gerald Polorotov (First Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) (Second Defendant) (Submitting Appearance) Thomas Goudkamp (in his capacity as a claims assessor appointed by SIRA) (Third Defendant) (Submitting Appearance) Representation: Counsel: K Rewell SC M A Robinson SC with G Foster (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate